# Creating a GMX Wealth Fund with RWA's and Tokenized RWA's **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [September 5, 2025, 6:42am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/creating-a-gmx-wealth-fund-with-rwas-and-tokenized-rwas/4845 "2025-09-05T06:42:05Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ShoeStar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@ShoeStar](https://gov.gmx.io/u/ShoeStar)\ **Post date:** [September 5, 2025, 6:42am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/creating-a-gmx-wealth-fund-with-rwas-and-tokenized-rwas/4845/1 "2025-09-05T06:42:05Z")
Hi, I am unsure of the details or whether this is even legal, but why not divert some of the revenue that is deposited into the treasury towards real equities and work with a proper broker, or hold tokenized RWA’s such as PAX Gold, or even short term US treasuries? This way we can diversify revenue streams and reduce risk of a single revenue stream that is the DEX. What do you guys think? Would this be considered legal due to the possibility of changing the status to an investment company? Of course, we could always stick to defi yields and such, however, this comes with it’s own additional set of risks. If my way were to work, than we can reduce risk through traunches of rev streams. Thank you for your time and attention. ---
**Author:** ![Seraph](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/gov.gmx.io/seraph/32/533_2.png) [@Seraph](https://gov.gmx.io/u/Seraph)\ **Post date:** [September 5, 2025, 11:59am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/creating-a-gmx-wealth-fund-with-rwas-and-tokenized-rwas/4845/2 "2025-09-05T11:59:19Z")
Just saw this. Not a bad idea, it’s can be considered by the treasury committee if my proposal works out. I believe treasury committee can farm / invest the money to grow the fund size. ---
**Author:** ![siyuan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/gov.gmx.io/siyuan/32/1839_2.png) [@siyuan](https://gov.gmx.io/u/siyuan)\ **Post date:** [October 7, 2025, 3:56pm UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/creating-a-gmx-wealth-fund-with-rwas-and-tokenized-rwas/4845/3 "2025-10-07T15:56:59Z")
agree very good think，that could lead gmx bigger ---
**Author:** ![coinflipcanada](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5fc32e/32.png) [@coinflipcanada](https://gov.gmx.io/u/coinflipcanada)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2025, 6:07pm UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/creating-a-gmx-wealth-fund-with-rwas-and-tokenized-rwas/4845/4 "2025-10-27T18:07:24Z")
Definitely think if more RWA markets get listed, it makes sense to be prepared to hold some of the more exotic assets as a sign of support to token issuers and other LPs in our own confidence for providing liquidity in these markets. GMX DAO leads by example holding exposure to say GLVs on both Arbitrum and Avalanche as a sign of our support on these new innovative vaults. ---
**Author:** ![Seraph](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/gov.gmx.io/seraph/32/533_2.png) [@Seraph](https://gov.gmx.io/u/Seraph)\ **Post date:** [October 29, 2025, 5:26am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/creating-a-gmx-wealth-fund-with-rwas-and-tokenized-rwas/4845/5 "2025-10-29T05:26:06Z")
Hi! would like to have most or all the suggestions to be in the mother of all proposal thread. > [@The GMX Flywheel – Reigniting Growth, Volume, and Price Momentum](https://gov.gmx.io/t/the-gmx-flywheel-reigniting-growth-volume-and-price-momentum/4902/19): > > Hi NXS, first of all thank you for this. I will like to take this opportunity to use this thread as the mother of all proposal threads, as there are about 5 or more proposals of various sorts currently active in forum. And I will would post comment on each proposal to visit this link instead, by virtual that this is the latest, as well as a much more comprehensive proposal Firstly I like to highlight a “weakness” of GMX contributors is that a lot of the work is done behind the scene and not co…