# Replace Uniswap from GLP with ARB

**URL:** https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985
**Category:** Proposals
**Created:** [March 25, 2023, 5:00am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985 "2023-03-25T05:00:13Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![horatio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f4b2a3/32.png) [@horatio](https://gov.gmx.io/u/horatio)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2023, 5:00am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985/1 "2023-03-25T05:00:13Z")

</div>

The other option could be just adding ARB to GLP and keeping Uniswap. Would like to see community thoughts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jonezee](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/gov.gmx.io/jonezee/32/1238_2.png) [@Jonezee](https://gov.gmx.io/u/Jonezee)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2023, 10:24pm UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985/2 "2023-03-25T22:24:07Z")

</div>

As GMX version 2 is soon to launch, and will allow for the trading of assets like Arb and other top cryptos through isolated token pools, there is no need to add any assets to GLP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![horatio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f4b2a3/32.png) [@horatio](https://gov.gmx.io/u/horatio)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2023, 5:47am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985/3 "2023-03-26T05:47:42Z")

</div>

ty I was silly and complete just blanked that GLPv2 was coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![the4hodlmen](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/gov.gmx.io/the4hodlmen/32/416_2.png) [@the4hodlmen](https://gov.gmx.io/u/the4hodlmen)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2023, 8:27am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985/4 "2023-03-27T08:27:23Z")

</div>

Not diving into v2 detail just yet. But based on my real life experience as a risk manager, having a real asset (in this $ARB tooen) to back is always a better risk mitigating strategy. I am a strong supporter of GMX til this date because so far GMX is always putting risk management ahead of top line (unlike other protocol that has this isolated market w/o owned underlying token, imo a ticking time-bomb)

Im short, please do consider including any token in GLP once its trading volume trigger a significant threshold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![homelesscouchboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b9e5f3/32.png) [@homelesscouchboy](https://gov.gmx.io/u/homelesscouchboy)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2023, 7:39am UTC](https://gov.gmx.io/t/replace-uniswap-from-glp-with-arb/1985/5 "2023-03-29T07:39:12Z")

</div>

Just add, no reason to replace anything