GLP V1 Arbitrum - Distribution Plan

Distribution Plan

Thank you to all community members and delegates who participated in the Snapshot vote about the Distribution plan for recovered funds from Arbitrum GLP.

A majority of the participating tokenholders chose the Distribution Plan consisting of GLV Distribution + a top-up from the Treasury + 500k incentives.

This decision means:

  • The distributed amounts will be split between the two Arbitrum GLV tokens, resulting in the users receiving approximately 25% WBTC, 25% ETH, and 50% stablecoins — closely mirroring the original GLP composition.

  • Long-term GLP holders will therefore maintain similar exposure to their original positions, allowing them to continue earning during the claim period and beyond

  • The DAO has contributed an additional $2 million from the Treasury to assist in covering the shortfall from the security incident.

  • $500,000 in GLV will be purchased and distributed to impacted users who claim and hold their GLV for three months. This distribution is a thank you for their continued support of the DAO.

  • GLV can be redeemed immediately, without lockup or vesting; however, users who redeem the GLV within the first 3 months will not receive a share of the additional $500k distribution.

As the next step, users impacted by the disclosed vulnerability in the Arbitrum GMX V1 deployment will soon have access to their distribution of GLV tokens. These GLV tokens will be claimable by GLP holders through an easy-to-use claim contract hosted on the Stake page of the dapp. Claiming from the distribution contract will include signing an on-chain transaction releasing the GMX DAO and affiliates of further claims.

Meanwhile, DeFi protocols that offer products based on GLP and require customised solutions as their contracts can’t directly claim will be handled separately. These protocols will subsequently announce how the distribution to their affected users will be handled. We appreciate your patience while these tailored solutions are being developed.

Additionally, the GLP tokens held by the whitehat who uncovered the vulnerability will be burned, which will proportionally result in those funds being redistributed to GLP holders.

List of eligible accounts and distribution amounts

The list of eligible accounts is available here: https://dune.com/queries/5535631?sidebar=none. This list includes both externally owned accounts (EOA) and smart contracts.

The GLP price used for the distribution calculations is $1.4522064768, which corresponds to the price at block 355880236.

To streamline the distribution and accounting process, the contributors have excluded LPs that held less than $1 worth of GLP at the time of the event. There are almost 400k such holders, accounting collectively for approximately $20k.

Users who sold their GLP after the vulnerability was disclosed will also receive a distribution of GLV. They will claim their share of the $42m distribution from the claim contract.

In the first round of distribution, the funds will be distributed to EOA’s and gnosis safes that can directly interact with the claim contract. Integrations will be addressed separately, as mentioned above.

The distribution page isn’t live yet. Once it goes live, affected users will be able to claim it over here: GMX | Decentralized Perpetual Exchange

Example of GLP User Claim Process

If you were holding $10,000 worth of GLP, you would claim about $4,575 worth of GLV [WETH-USDC] and $4,575 worth of GLV [BTC-USDC] as part of the distribution, while $850 residual funds can be withdrawn from the GLP pool.

For example, Anne held $10,000 in GLP. She continued to hold her GLP during and after the event. She will claim approximately $9,150 in GLV from the claim contract, split between GLV [WETH-USDC] and GLV [BTC-USDC] liquidity tokens. And she will withdraw from the GLP vault for the remaining ~$850.

Boris held $20,000 in GLP. He sold all his GLP when he heard about the vulnerability. Boris will claim the remainder (worth approximately $18,300) in the form of GLV from the claim contract, divided into GLV [WETH-USDC] and GLV [BTC-USDC] tokens. Since the residual funds in GLP were already withdrawn by Boris, there is nothing more for him to withdraw.

Clarice held $500 in GLP via the yield optimisation protocol Beefy Finance, which integrates GLP. She will also receive GLV as part of the distribution plan for affected users. However, she will not use the claims contract. Instead, she will wait for an announcement from Beefy about how the distribution to their users will be handled.

Please note: All numbers are approximate and for illustration purposes only. The values of GLP and GLV are volatile, and actual values at the time of claim and/or redemption may vary depending on the state of the vaults and the assets within them.

2 Likes

What if user held GLP via Beefy Finance, but withdrawn GLP tokens from Beefy finance to their own wallet after exploit, but still keeps GLP?

That user will be able to sell that GLP as soon as redeeming GLP is possible again. And claim his share of the GLV distribution as well.

2 Likes

could you please doublecheck the Dune query @Jonezee ??
I am one of these Beefy users and my addy is not in the dune dashboard (after a very quick look, because of the filter on GLP token > 1$). Thanks :folded_hands:

1 Like

Hi! I only saw 24 contracts in this list https://dune.com/queries/5535631?sidebar=none. They are listed in descending order and end with a total of 175,219.6 GLP. Where are the contracts with lower GLP amounts? I didn’t see them in this list.

The table with the eligible addresses on Dune is paginated. You have to use the arrow symbols to go to the next tab with another two dozen addresses. But its easiest to use the search function and paste in your 0x there.

2 Likes

what about the beefy users ? they’re clearly not in this dune query as you only filter for GLP holders (beefy users were holding mooGmxGLP instead)

It is possible that GMX DEV also found problems with ARCHI FINANCNE. I would still like to remind you that the ARCHI project has been in deficit in the past six months, because the contract has been out of operation for a long time and cannot liquidate borrowers, so it is necessary to eliminate borrowers who have lost money before distributing funds

Hey @eklureuil, as mentioned in the proposal, since you hold the funds in Beefy vaults, you’ll need to check with the Beefy team.

1 Like

Contract names are extracted from contract_mapping dune table, so not all smaller or unknown contract tagged properly. But they still are included on eligible addresses list. Check “Is contract?” column.

I assume just few of these unknown contract will be able to claim, but claims contract has functionality to transfer pending claim to different address so GMX admins should be able to help later.

1 Like

Hello!

Do you have guide how swap glp to glv?

Or we wait it?

Hi @AlexVod, please wait for now. You won’t need to swap. You will be able to sell any GLP you hold as you normally would, once redeeming is enabled again. And you will be able to claim GLV through the claim function in the dApp as part of the distribution plan, alongside.

9.7.2025…….1 eth 2615

9.8.2025…….1 eth 4223

9.7.2025……..1 btc 108950

9.8.2025……..1 btc 117601

What’s happening with usdc or GL???

Announcement coming this week about the final stage of the Distribution Plan, please be patient.

Important Protocol Update: Scheduled GLP Burn and Value Adjustment

After the GMX V1 incident, the user who exposed the vulnerability currently owns ~13m GLP.

As the user has accepted the $5m bug bounty, this GLP has been scheduled to be burnt in the coming week.

Burning this GLP would result in an immediate 40% increase in GLP price.

After this GLP is burnt, GLP redemptions would be re-enabled. GLP minting will continue to remain closed.

For integrations, please review your protocol’s GLP integrations and reach out immediately if this change could cause any operational issues.

Examples of Potential Impact Areas for Integrations:

  • Oracle Dependencies: Protocols that rely on GLP valuations for pricing or collateral calculations
  • Vault Exposure: Any systems where users can mint into vaults holding GLP before the value increase occurs

If no material integration issues are identified, the burn will occur in the week of 18 - 22 Aug.

1 Like

GMX has successfully completed its ~$44M Distribution Plan for $GLP holders on Arbitrum affected by the recently disclosed V1 vulnerability.

Eligible users can now claim their distribution in the GMX dApp: GMX | Decentralized Perpetual Exchange

You will find the claims interface at the bottom of the Staking page, alongside an FAQ answering common questions about the GLP incident.

Please note: Wallets that hold the full amount of claimed GLV for at least 3 months will receive a share of $500,000 in retention incentives, made available by the GMX DAO.

:small_blue_diamond: ~$44M is available for distribution — All impacted GLP holders are being made whole
:small_blue_diamond: The claim is in two $GLV tokens, the yield-optimising GMX Liquidity Vaults from V2
:small_blue_diamond: GLV tokens equate to ~25% WBTC, 25% ETH, 50% stables

———

Read the full announcement on X: https://x.com/GMX_IO/status/1955635464398147712

You gave this example in the article. After claiming GLP and receiving GLV, I still have GLP. In your example, they can also be exchanged for USDC. But I can’t do anything with them. What should I do?

Scheduled GLP Burn and Value Adjustment

After the GMX V1 incident, the user who exposed the vulnerability currently owns ~13m GLP.

As the user has accepted the $5m bug bounty, this GLP has been scheduled to be burnt in the coming week.

Burning this GLP would result in an immediate 40% increase in GLP price.

After this GLP is burnt, GLP redemptions would be re-enabled. GLP minting will continue to remain closed.

For integrations, please review your protocol’s GLP integrations and reach out immediately if this change could cause any operational issues.

Examples of Potential Impact Areas for Integrations:

  • Oracle Dependencies: Protocols that rely on GLP valuations for pricing or collateral calculations
  • Vault Exposure: Any systems where users can mint into vaults holding GLP before the value increase occurs

If no material integration issues are identified, the burn will occur in the week of 18 - 22 Aug.

2 Likes

Hey guys, regarding GLP / GMX / Beefy.
Such a conversation happened on Beefy discord today.
Can you please bring more light to what is happening in terms of compensation for Beefy customers from your perspective? For GLP holders it is kind of messy as ping pong is happening and people are lost, it is not clear if something is going on with it in general.
If you can provide some information regarding that from your perspective it would be great as it seems there is some misscommunication between Beefy and GMX or idk what is happening.

p.s. maybe you can restart conversation on GLP with beefy as probably it doesn’t work for some reason now

@Saurabh

1 Like

ok, maybe I rushed a bit with my question, just found this on gmx discord, seems it is in progress by both of you