Your focus is and has always been wrong. Changing the tokenomics hasn’t caused the price’s downfall; lack of users, Arbitrum losing mindshare, revenue, and volume have and GMX being one of the only perp dexes at that moment. This has been confirmed multiple times when we compare GMX to ETH price action. So, your comments on GMX went down since MP was removed. They are false, have been proven false, and have nothing to do with it.
It seems you get very defensive when people point out that you’re not telling the truth or when people don’t share your ideas.
Our primary focus of should and always has been, focusing on bringing in more traders with:
- Use GMX staking together with trading discount to lower fees for power users lowering fees close to CEX/Hyperliquid levels
- Express trading, allowing users to trade without signing messages, less rpc issues as it’s broadcasted via APIs instead of RPCs giving a CEX like experience.
- Multichain, allowing every user to trade on GMX from every EVM chain possible introducing us to newer chains and hopefully a lot of newer users.
- Listings of RWA / Forex / stock markets options
I don’t see how your ‘recommendations’ help GMX as a platform or a token. As you powerfully show in your post by referencing my comment, more than half of GMX is still staked, which you can see here: https://dune.com/saulius/gmx-analytics. Nor have I heard anyone say they don’t want to receive GMX when staking; the majority voted for it, do you remember?
What would you do with the ‘point’ system? Clearly saying I want them back, but not providing any comments on how they should work, seems very stale to me.