it is disappointing how things turned out, it is not 100% certain whether things would have been better had nothing been changed, when the original MP capping proposal was created, token price was already not doing well, of course it is much worse now
for what it is worth, at the time of the MP capping proposal, i was unsure of what the effect would be, there were pros and cons for both sides, and i was also not against the change
i was considering whether the issue is having too many differing opinions and something like tokenomics should be delegated to a focused team
but i think that would be very difficult, something as sensitive as tokenomics would lead to a lot of unhappy people if just a single team were making the decision on it
i recall at the time of the previous tokenomics change there was again a lot of differing ideas, the ideas were consolidated and the community voted on their preferred solution to focus on
so what we have now is not ideal, but i don’t see a better way to do this, we either continue to allow the community to choose and experiment with the tokenomics (taking up development time for this) or we have a vote to decide not to change the tokenomics again and focus on the protocol
to me personally, not allowing changes seems like it would be the less ideal route