Deployment of GMX in BNB Chain

Hello @randomishwalk & @IceCream

It depends on which angle you look at it, if you are looking at a % total TVL by chains, protocols like AAVE, Uniswap, Balancer, Curve, etc. are consistently becoming top protocols on chains they expand to.
So liquidity on those chains will tend to concentrate on those reputable DeFi protocols, but overall chains liquidity they expand to is much lower than Ethereum so in absolute numbers won’t look so good!

It’s a very interesting point, I’m wondering how the community sees this kind of incentive.
We are confident that there is an untapped new market with new users and fresh liquidity for GMX on the BNB Chain, but this kind of incentive will also encourage users from Arbitrum / Avalanche to come to BNB Chain which is not so interesting I think for the community and the team, what’s your view on that?


Think just about fees-part right now. Imagine incentive program and closer cooperation with Binance. In the bull market, this can help us generate a lot more fees for stakers. From the business side it is a good deal from ideology side centralisation may bother some…
i decided to fully support this proposal

Let’s look at the data.

  1. BSC consistently among top chains to earn fees -
  2. BSC’s DAU count is among top 2 for last 6 months - Daily active users | Metrics | Token Terminal
  3. Pancakeswap, DEX on BSC is among top 3 DEX’s - Exchange | Markets | Token Terminal
  4. Almost all the top dApps have already onboarded to BSC
  5. BSC is decentralized enough, I don’t see it being centralized more than any other side chain or L2

All in all, looks good proposal to me. The only concern I have is if developers have time to start working on it or not. They are already busy with synths right now and then further developments are already in pipeline

TLDR; I am fully in support of this proposal.


That is a very interesting idea imo, both a good catalyst for on-chain trading, as well as an interesting option to increase GLP liquidity.

Indeed, I find it very interesting too.
And from BNB Chain side, we will be happy to strongly support this initiative and make it happen!


The main issue with the BSC chain back then was that the RPCs were unreliable. That hampered the on-chain trading experience for users significantly.

But this has been remedied for a while now, as far as I know.


That is a great point yes they have made some strides there.

But you could I think also say the same thing for Polygon PoS sidechain (RPCs were bad, now they are less bad). And at least they have every intention to migrate to a better security model.

1 Like

I think the only reliable measure of activity is fees (protocol or total fees). If people are not willing to pay for a service like a DeFi protocol, it is hard to claim I think that it is being used in an organic basis. But just my personal POV. That is a good point you make!

Lets make BNB Chain great again!
If not we, then WHO?
I want my assets to be exposed to Binance marketing machine!
Dont forget their intention to focus peoples attention on self-custodial wallets (TrustWallet) and Binance need a good solid toys for all that army of self-custodial new Chad’s. So its better to give them GMX instead of some cheap clone with dubious reputation… so its kind of our duty! to expose great protocol to new wave of web3.0 users… because…
If not we, then WHO?

PS: @randomishwalk @gmx your comments and thoughts is really interesting btw… and ofc I agree with them in parts… but… instead of making restriction for “move” may be lets reveal all the most biggest potential pains in that intention and lets define possible actions in that extreme cases.


Yes precisely! Let’s surface the key technical/operational/security issues this poses, see what we can deal with vs not and then determine best course of action, subject to some criteria that’s something along the lines of “hey what are we actually trying to accomplish here”

yes that’s a great pt. again I don’t think this should be done to the detriment of the existing community and loyal users which is why this should be deliberated over and explored some more before committing to anything. I am still pretty unconvinced, but tbh we don’t have all the information here available to make a good decision

Please before proceeding with this proposal, just get the answer to one important but simple question:

How many BNB are actually in circulation?

1 Like

Strongly agree on the “NO”!


How to dislike this post? :neutral_face:


Yes!! I’m in favor!!

Curious to see the outcome of the snapshot!

1 Like

oh man this is going to be a split vote it looks like. Need to do more thinking before I decide but commenting to follow the thread.

Good proposal by the BNB team!

Yes, BNB has a lot of users and a bunch of protocols, but it’s not really known for high quality DeFi. My first time using DeFi was on BNB, there’s some sentimental value there but I don’t really like Binance or how they develop their ecosystem. It’s all rugs, low effort forks.

In my honest opinion, BNB stands to gain more than GMX from a deployment there - it would dilute the GMX brand which has done great at limiting deployments to chains with high-quality DeFi ecosystem and legit innovation. There’s not that many collabs/integration GMX can explore on BNB that aren’t already on AVAX/Arbitrum. I say quality over quantity, frankly: focus on existing deployments and winning in those ecosystems!

They just want a splashy announcement out of this

1 Like

Strong yes from me as long as security is the #1 priority.

Also without any dilution so $GMX, so no esGMX rewards for GLP, but I would be open to it if BSC matched rewards 1:1 with BNB.



Conheci a GMX na BNB e seria bom um retorno as origens.

I want to add one another point; it seems Uniswap deployment on BNB chain will also happen soon. BNB and Binance wants to get a big pie on DeFi so we can assume there will be more sophisticated protocols on BNB chain.

If GMX won’t expand to the BNB chain i’m sure Level or Ede or some other perp protocol would fill this area. I am supporting this expantion.


I think GMX has the opportunity to expand on other chains such as BNB, Polygon etc. However this needs to be considered after deployment of Synthetics. Otherwise going to BNB ecosystem would be an overall great expansion of the protocol.

1 Like