$1 and 1,000,000 $GMX

Summary

The two core pillars of our work are protocol growth and token price performance. Protocol growth will be addressed in subsequent proposals; this proposal focuses on aligning the GMX team’s incentives with the long-term success of GMX itself.

A previous proposal shifted buybacks from immediate distribution to accumulated, unified distribution, ensuring that all token holders’ interests and objectives are aligned and maximizing returns for long-term holders. That measure addressed alignment at the community level.

This proposal is the equivalent measure for the GMX team. With the recent leadership transition and a renewed focus on execution, GMX Labs is shifting into a more startup-style operating mode. In that mode, team compensation should be structured the way high-conviction startups structure it: modest fixed pay, with the upside tied directly to the long-term success of what we are building. Every team member’s reward should follow GMX’s success not precede it.

Only if GMX succeeds will the team succeed.

Motivation

Today, GMX contributors are paid in a combination of USDC and GMX, with GMX making up a meaningful share of monthly compensation. Under the current mechanism, GMX is freely sellable on receipt. The result is that GMX, as it stands today, is functioning primarily as compensation not as a long-term alignment mechanism.
We want a model where team rewards are unlocked only when GMX itself succeeds, and where the team is rewarded after the community has been served.

Rationale

1. Eliminate Immediate-Sellable GMX Compensation

Going forward, GMX will no longer be issued to team members as immediately-sellable compensation. Team incentive in GMX will only come through the performance-triggered structure described below.

2. Performance-Triggered Team Rewards — 2,000,000 GMX in Two Tranches

The DAO authorizes a reserve of up to 2,000,000 GMX as a long-term team incentive pool, structured in two equal tranches each tied to a token price milestone. Each tranche unlocks only when its trigger is met:

  • Tranche 1 — 1,000,000 GMX, triggered when the 30-day TWAP of GMX exceeds $100
  • Tranche 2 — 1,000,000 GMX, triggered when the 30-day TWAP of GMX exceeds $1,000

Source of GMX: The source of funding to fulfill these obligations, if the milestones are met, will be decided by the DAO through a separate proposal at the appropriate time. Possible options the DAO may consider include:

  • Newly minted GMX — up to the protocol’s maximum supply (inclusive of esGMX considerations)
  • Existing GMX treasury reserves — excluding accrued staking rewards
  • A dedicated buyback program — executed under favorable market conditions

This proposal does not prescribe a funding mechanism. That decision is explicitly left to the DAO and will be addressed through a separate governance process when needed.

Price oracle: The trigger will be evaluated using a 30-day TWAP from the Chainlink GMX/USD price feed to prevent gaming via short-term spikes.

Critically, every team trigger is set above the corresponding community trigger — community holders capture upside first; the team is rewarded only after the community has been served.

3. Distribution Principles

Each tranche, when triggered, is allocated across the team according to the following principles:

  • The majority of each tranche is allocated to the CEO and Senior leadership, who carry the greatest accountability for GMX’s success.
  • A meaningful share goes to the broader contributor base to ensure team-wide alignment.
  • An outstanding-contributions allocation rewards exceptional individual impact during the period leading to the trigger.
  • Time-weighted within pools so that earlier and longer-serving contributors receive a proportionally larger share than later joiners.

Detailed allocation percentages, pool definitions, time-weighting mechanics, and the contributor designation process will be administered by the CEO and leadership team under an internal compensation policy, with annual transparency reporting back to the DAO.

4. Vesting Schedule

All allocated GMX is subject to multi-year linear vesting from the trigger date of each tranche. The vesting structure is designed to ensure long-term alignment and gradual supply release.

The longer vesting periods apply to the most senior leadership roles, where accountability for long-term GMX success is greatest. The shorter vesting period applies to broader contributors. The specific mapping of roles to vesting tiers is administered by the CEO and leadership team under an internal compensation policy.

Each 1,000,000 GMX tranche vests according to the following structure:

  • 50% of each tranche — vests linearly over 5 years (60 months) from trigger date
  • 30% of each tranche — vests linearly over 3 years (36 months) from trigger date
  • 20% of each tranche — vests linearly over 1 year (12 months) from trigger date

Supply impact: Maximum GMX entering circulation in any 12-month period from this program is approximately 800,000 GMX, and only in the most aggressive case where both tranches trigger simultaneously. In any realistic scenario where tranches trigger sequentially, annual circulation impact is substantially lower.

5. Departure & Clawback

The internal compensation policy will define how allocations are adjusted in the event of voluntary departure, termination for cause, or other circumstances. The DAO retains the right to revoke or claw back any allocation in the event of misconduct, fraud, or material breach of fiduciary duty.

CEO Compensation: $1 and Aligned With GMX

Q, as the incoming CEO, is committing to a base compensation of $1 per year in place of any USD-denominated cash compensation. His upside is tied entirely to his existing GMX position and his participation in the performance-triggered pool described above.

The math is simple:

  • If GMX succeeds, the CEO’s existing GMX position appreciates significantly — that is more than enough.
  • If GMX does not succeed, the CEO draws $1 and imposes zero compensation burden on the protocol.

Relationship to the 2026–2027 Funding Proposal

This proposal modifies the contributor GMX token allocation portion of the GMX Labs 2026–2027 Funding Proposal. Specifically:

What this proposal changes

  • The 250,000 GMX contributor token allocation (~10,000 GMX/month linear distribution) approved in the 2026–2027 funding proposal will be terminated effective at the end of June.
  • The grace period allows for an orderly transition of existing contributor compensation expectations.
  • Starting from the end of the grace period, the new framework described in this proposal takes effect. From that point forward, no monthly GMX is distributed as compensation; team rewards in GMX flow exclusively through the performance-triggered tranches described above.

What this proposal does not change

  • The operating funds portion of the 2026–2027 funding proposal ($7M annual floor / $9M annual ceiling, sourced from 8.8% net V2 protocol fees) remains in effect unchanged by this proposal. If adjustments to operating funds are needed in the future, they will be addressed through a separate proposal.

Effective Date

  • Grace period: End of June 2026
  • New framework effective: Day 1 following the grace period — concurrent with termination of the existing monthly GMX allocation

Accountability and Reporting

  • When a tranche triggers, GMX Labs will publish a pre-distribution transparency report to the DAO showing the detailed allocation plan, including who receives what, vesting schedule per recipient, and the rationale for each allocation.
  • GMX Labs will also provide an annual transparency report to the DAO covering allocations made under each pool, vesting status, departures, and any material changes to the internal compensation policy.
  • The DAO retains revocation and clawback rights as described above.
  • Any structural changes to tranche sizes, price triggers, or alignment principles require a new DAO proposal.

Conclusion

The team wins only if GMX wins. The community is served first; the team is rewarded only after the community has been rewarded. Every team member’s upside is tied directly to the long-term success of the protocol. The community is requested to review this proposal and and share feedback on the proposed performance-triggered incentive pool outlined above

5 Likes

Speaking as a contributor who currently receives part of monthly compensation in GMX, I fully support this proposal.

What’s being asked of the team here is real: we give up immediately-sellable monthly GMX in exchange for vested upside that only unlocks if GMX itself succeeds, and only then after community holders have been served first.

And Q taking $1 is the strongest possible signal of alignment with GMX, and is lovely to see.

Make GMX Great Again.

5 Likes

This proposal is a strong one, and creates an team alignment with the token price, firstly mad respect to Q for taking 1$ salary and aligning more towards GMX to prove his vision.

Overall would think the token needs to be accumulated before it reaches those twap prices else it be impossible to push for those prices, but still aggressive proposal and i like the concept here.

Thanks to all the team members for this alignment and sacrifice. Would vote Yes.

4 Likes

I’m entirely good with this approach to compensation.

Receiving some GMX as a bonus always felt fitting, and I usually happily staked them. But there’s a sub-optimal dynamic to getting paid in sellable tokens and knowing others do as well, even if the amounts aren’t large. This proposal addresses that well.

We only win if the community wins. Feels apt, for GMX.

3 Likes

love this.
team wins only after after community has been rewarded.

Lets move towards the secondary target of $1000 per GMX token.
Kudos to Q for offering to take $1 salary.
And to all contributors for building hard.

2 Likes

Great proposal. It shows strong conviction from the team and should help rebuild confidence and reduce uncertainty around the GMX team.

4 Likes

I love this job and more than to building Gmx up and up

2 Likes

I see this proposal as broadly neutral-to-positive from an alignment and confidence perspective.

Based on my observation, only a relatively small part of distributed GMX tends to be sold immediately, so I would not expect this change alone to create a major direct supply reduction impact.

For me, this is more of a marketing / alignment signal around the new CEO and team structure than a core protocol-growth proposal. That is not necessarily bad, but I would prefer the discussion to quickly move beyond ambitious GMX price targets and into concrete actions that can materially improve GMX’s future: user growth, volume, product competitiveness, integrations, liquidity, and revenue sustainability.

So I support the idea, but in addition I would like to see real execution-focused proposals follow this.

5 Likes

i love this,

gmx is coiling up, hope to see cooler marketing on classic distribution channels like youtube, thats what we were going to do, image gen goes pretty hard, slap gmx logo, write cta, and some tunes, 1-6 times a day, the type of content with the quality attention at gmx dao, special thanks to contributors for managing community channels: discord, telegram and x, but i suggest welcoming youtube and entering the content game instead of the esoteric defi play, you can always point to read that, consider who becomes a new user of this and why, because its cool and authentic, thats the better entry, example our discovery was during covid like a lot of players that was the case,

a great product poorly marketed, not marketed, fails… a bad product marketed succeeds, its a function of force

gmtrade is really on the right track with marketing so thats probably all in some kind of motion, youtube should be considered for distribution from here not x primarily, im not some success case yet but its true they pay more and have best long term use to date

1 Like

i’m generally in favor, please maybe add numbers

on how many contributors are currently in the team, how we keep people motivated to build if we seem to never reach the numbers mentioned and what happens if someone leaves and someone joins the team.