For, this proposal, would be keen on committee suggestions such as which individual, do hope the chosen members are non-biased and not from other committee if possible else there is overlapping roles and concentrated power within key individuals. Would suggest for more diverse selection, but all for proposal
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discussion: Supporting GMX Solana Expansion via Monthly GT Token Treasury Swap | 32 | 829 | August 31, 2025 | |
|
Gmx v2: sustainable development
|
36 | 7375 | July 12, 2023 | |
| GMX Governance Committee | 9 | 644 | August 14, 2024 | |
| # GMX Treasury — Three-Fund Architecture, esGMX-Only Discounts (up to −80%), and 50/50 Fee Distribution | 7 | 368 | October 29, 2025 | |
| Treasury diversification through the sale of esGMX tokens | 43 | 5542 | December 11, 2022 |