Treasury diversification through the sale of esGMX tokens

Proposals
1

We propose to raise funds through a sale of esGMX tokens to increase the work hours that can be committed to GMX development.

Some background:

  • GMX began as XVIX in November 2020
  • The XVIX project launched with a liquidity generation event in which anyone could participate
  • At launch, $30,000 worth of ETH and UDSC had been contributed, all circulating XVIX tokens were paired with these funds and added as liquidity on Uniswap, there was no team allocation
  • The team received 0.07% of XVIX transferred on each token transfer
  • Since the fees were minimal we did not have funds to continue development or to pay for audits, etc
  • To continue development, the Gambit project was created in March 2021, a total of 900k was raised, with 450k sent to the GMT-BUSD pool for liquidity
  • The remaining 450k raised has been used to pay for audits, Gambit trading competition prizes and to fund development
  • In September 2021, Gambit was migrated to be GMX on Arbitrum, with an initial allocation of 250k GMX Tokens for team tokens vesting linearly over two years

At the moment, the GMX team has two developers committing full-time, all other operations including marketing are handled by community members working part-time while receiving a mix of USDC and GMX tokens for their contributions.

Development priorities for 2022:

  • Improving GLP performance
  • Referral links
  • Capturing MEV from price updates and redistributing the arbitrage profits to GMX and GLP holders
  • Trading incentives
  • Interface improvements
  • New chains
  • Integrating GMX and GLP with more DeFi partners
  • X4 which will be a new kind of AMM that will enable new types of DeFi projects to be built
  • The X4 project will use the GMX token, no new tokens will be created

The funds will also enable better support for partnerships and community projects, including the GMX leaderboard, the GMX Blueberry Club, if they need any help, and new projects that might be proposed.

Proposed conversion from part-time to full-time roles:

  • Operations (@y4cards)
  • Marketing and collaborations (@coinflipcanada)
  • A team of two additional members for marketing and collaborations
  • Project manager, designer and frontend development team (@xhiroz and team)
  • Frontend developer (@vipineth)

Sale Terms

We propose to have the following terms for the sale:

  • The sale will be for 100k esGMX tokens
  • The esGMX tokens will be sold using Olympus bonds over 1 week
  • the discount on the tokens will be determined by the market, if there are no purchases then the discount will increase over time, if there are purchases then the discount will decrease
  • The starting price will be at 0.9 * GMX market price at the time
  • The tokens will come from the partnerships / marketing / community development fund

Vesting Rules

  • esGMX tokens are not transferrable / sellable, they can be vested into GMX tokens over 365 days
  • Vesting is optional, esGMX can be staked for esGMX and ETH rewards
  • The vesting of esGMX requires holding GMX at a 1:4 ratio, e.g. to vest 100 esGMX, a purchaser must hold and stake at least 400 GMX tokens
  • The process would be (1) stake 400 GMX, (2) deposit 100 esGMX into the vesting vault, both actions can be done on the GMX interface
  • While vesting, esGMX converts to GMX every second and is claimable through the interface
  • Staked GMX continues to receive esGMX and ETH rewards
  • Vesting can be paused and restarted at anytime, esGMX that had been converted to GMX will remain as GMX
  • Vesting amounts are flexible, if an account has 100 esGMX and 200 GMX, 50 esGMX can be vested at a time, and the 100 esGMX would be fully vested over 2 years, the mimimum vesting time will remain as 365 days even if an account has more GMX than the 1:4 ratio
  • Vesting can be done at anytime, the GMX required to vest can be acquired at anytime
  • GMX that had been bought prior to this sale can be used for vesting, if an account already had sufficient GMX before this sale, then no new purchases would be required for that account to vest esGMX
  • As an example, if an account already has 400 GMX staked, and has so far earned 200 esGMX in rewards, if the account purchases 100 esGMX, they would be able to vest the total of 300 esGMX using their 400 staked GMX tokens
  • Buyers will be able to indicate if they would want to receive the esGMX tokens on Arbitrum or Avalanche
34 Likes
2

What a brilliant proposal. Am hugely for this, and will be one of the biggest steps towards driving GMX forward to being one of the dominant decentralised exchanges.

The only question I had is whether you could add an option for vesting with GLP too? A lot of GLP stakers earn significant proportions of esGMX, and it would certainly improve the total raise of the sale if you facilitated them to be able to vest too!

Brilliant work!

Joe

12 Likes
3

Seems like a timely proposal. I’m in favour.

3 Likes
4

Great proposal, aimed at attracting longer term capital and supports the protocols goals. I’m certainly in favour.

4 Likes
5

I’m in favor of this. The development priorities seem in line with what the community wants to do. Bringing on additional members of the team full time has been on the wish list since the dawn of time (not knocking X, u amazing legend). I think the esGMX sales to raise funds for the team is a great play as it would be the first way to capture the current market value of esGMX and could lead to future developments with the future trading of esGMX (wut iz discount on locked GMX???).

2 Likes
6

Yes, vesting option for GLP holders would be cool

5 Likes
7

Agree with this proposal but I would also be in favor of a GLP vesting option as well.

3 Likes
8

I would vote yes. But just a question. Should the development fund also be increased from the fees generated. Right now it might not be required but in the long run or if more money would increase development speed it would also be fine.

1 Like
9

Completely in favor of this proposal. in addition - Why not fund development with a small percentage of fee gmx eth revenue… it won’t take that much over time.

2 Likes
10

Backing this 100%. Fair proposal and well thought out plan. Looking forward to the progress.

1 Like
11

All in favour of growing out the team and reducing key man risk. A lot rests on X’s shoulders right now.

Assuming we raise $3-4m and add the 8 new members of staff, roughly how much runway would we have before needing to sell more esGMX?

2 Likes
12

I would vote yes and appreciate all the hustle, this is the best I can offer for the protocol.

1 Like
13

Fully aligned with the proposal.

Congrats to the new team members.

Excited to know more about X4 and future plans. So much potential here.

This is the way

2 Likes
14

Why not begin the sale of esGMX at a market rate of 1.1x the price of GMX there might be some big speculators that want to eat the entire amount without any slippage and might as well make them pay for the premium of doing so.

3 Likes
15

Is there any proposal for what the raised funds will go to in particular? 1) how many people would be hired, 2) what would they work on 3) how much would each cost

1 Like
16

Thank you and thank you for the suggestion, I think having GLP at a higher ratio could make sense, will discuss with the team more on that

1 Like
17

Could make sense as well for the long term, I think that would be something for the GMX DAO to decide when a more formal structure for it is setup

18

3m-4m should last 3-4 years, underestimating it a bit cos I think it would be good to factor in some buffer for additional costs like audits, etc.

19

makes sense, that is possible as well

1 Like
20

Based on the list in the first post, there would be around 10 people in total, if the amount paid per person is around 8k per month, that would give a runway of about 12 months for $1 million

1 Like